Walter Keen
2012-09-05 23:57:46 UTC
Having an issue with OpenNMS 1.10.5, it lists nodes, collects data in it's .jrb files, and shows the snmp data for the router when you view the node information, and shows managed IP's on that node, however does not show ANY physical interfaces, and when I try to look at resource graphs there are none to view.
This installation was running fine for about 5 days, and is on a linux system with 12 cores, 16gb ram, running centos 6.3. file systems follow the opennms tuning guide as closely as we can for filesystem choices/etc.
I've set the following to debug, but nothing obvious is present .
I've restarted the opennms process, the postgres process (separately) and rebooted the machine.
I'm wondering if I should collect more data and submit a bug report before trying more drastic changes like wiping the postgres db, and starting over (importing the provisioning groups from the xml files), or downgrading to a 1.8 series opennms.
However, I'm not sure what data is best to collect -- Anyone have any suggestions?
log4j.category.OpenNMS.Stds=DEBUG, STDS
log4j.category.OpenNMS.Miscellaneous=DEBUG, MISC
log4j.category.OpenNMS.Spring=DEBUG, SPRING
log4j.category.Reportd=DEBUG, REPORTD
log4j.category.OpenNMS.Manager=DEBUG, MANAGER
log4j.category.OpenNMS.JettyServer=DEBUG, JETTY
log4j.category.org.eclipse.jetty=DEBUG, JETTY
log4j.category.OpenNMS.Report=DEBUG, REPORT
log4j.category.Instrumentation=DEBUG, INSTRUMENT
This installation was running fine for about 5 days, and is on a linux system with 12 cores, 16gb ram, running centos 6.3. file systems follow the opennms tuning guide as closely as we can for filesystem choices/etc.
I've set the following to debug, but nothing obvious is present .
I've restarted the opennms process, the postgres process (separately) and rebooted the machine.
I'm wondering if I should collect more data and submit a bug report before trying more drastic changes like wiping the postgres db, and starting over (importing the provisioning groups from the xml files), or downgrading to a 1.8 series opennms.
However, I'm not sure what data is best to collect -- Anyone have any suggestions?
log4j.category.OpenNMS.Stds=DEBUG, STDS
log4j.category.OpenNMS.Miscellaneous=DEBUG, MISC
log4j.category.OpenNMS.Spring=DEBUG, SPRING
log4j.category.Reportd=DEBUG, REPORTD
log4j.category.OpenNMS.Manager=DEBUG, MANAGER
log4j.category.OpenNMS.JettyServer=DEBUG, JETTY
log4j.category.org.eclipse.jetty=DEBUG, JETTY
log4j.category.OpenNMS.Report=DEBUG, REPORT
log4j.category.Instrumentation=DEBUG, INSTRUMENT